﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Visiting the Supposed Crime Scene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://koehlerlaw.net/2010/04/on-visiting-the-supposed-crime-scene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://koehlerlaw.net/2010/04/on-visiting-the-supposed-crime-scene/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on-visiting-the-supposed-crime-scene</link>
	<description>Criminal and DUI Defense in Washington, D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:38:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamison</title>
		<link>http://koehlerlaw.net/2010/04/on-visiting-the-supposed-crime-scene/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>jamison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://koehlerlaw.net/?p=2252#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>Yes, Mirriam Seddiq is a first-rate criminal defense attorney.  She is also a lot of fun.  

You can find out more about Mirriam through her website, Not Guilty No Way, which is included on my blogroll to the right.

She has also been featured in a number of recent blog entries.  Windy Pundit started it out with a piece he did called “We Are All Not Guilty of Something” in late March at 
http://www.windypundit.com/archives/2010/03/we_are_all_not_guilty_of_somet.html.  He lists her affectionately on his blogroll as “A Lawyer In Search of a Clue.”

Scott Greenfield and I both featured her on entries we did toward the end of March.  Greenfield’s entry, called “Fonts of Wisdom,” cited her as a blog to watch at http://blog.simplejustice.us/2010/03/25/fonts-of-wisdom.aspx.  I featured her at
http://koehlerlaw.net/2010/03/on-mirriam-seddiq-and-the-not-guilty-no-way-blog/

Brian Tannebaum and Mark Bennett have both written about her within the last week or so.  Tannebaum’s entry is called “A Chick Criminal Defense Blogger” and is at http://criminaldefenseblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/chick-criminal-defense-blogger.html.  Bennett’s entry is called “The New Kids on the Blawck” and can be found at http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2010/04/the-new-kids-on-the-blawck.html

So, yes, you are not the only person who is impressed with Seddiq.

The answer to your question on attorney-client privilege is probably a bit too complicated to satisfactorily address here.  Allow me to say that Mirriam has been working with me on this particular case.  Anything that was said in her presence would thus be covered under the privilege.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Mirriam Seddiq is a first-rate criminal defense attorney.  She is also a lot of fun.  </p>
<p>You can find out more about Mirriam through her website, Not Guilty No Way, which is included on my blogroll to the right.</p>
<p>She has also been featured in a number of recent blog entries.  Windy Pundit started it out with a piece he did called “We Are All Not Guilty of Something” in late March at<br />
<a href="http://www.windypundit.com/archives/2010/03/we_are_all_not_guilty_of_somet.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.windypundit.com/archives/2010/03/we_are_all_not_guilty_of_somet.html</a>.  He lists her affectionately on his blogroll as “A Lawyer In Search of a Clue.”</p>
<p>Scott Greenfield and I both featured her on entries we did toward the end of March.  Greenfield’s entry, called “Fonts of Wisdom,” cited her as a blog to watch at <a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2010/03/25/fonts-of-wisdom.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blog.simplejustice.us/2010/03/25/fonts-of-wisdom.aspx</a>.  I featured her at<br />
<a href="http://koehlerlaw.net/2010/03/on-mirriam-seddiq-and-the-not-guilty-no-way-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://koehlerlaw.net/2010/03/on-mirriam-seddiq-and-the-not-guilty-no-way-blog/</a></p>
<p>Brian Tannebaum and Mark Bennett have both written about her within the last week or so.  Tannebaum’s entry is called “A Chick Criminal Defense Blogger” and is at <a href="http://criminaldefenseblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/chick-criminal-defense-blogger.html" rel="nofollow">http://criminaldefenseblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/chick-criminal-defense-blogger.html</a>.  Bennett’s entry is called “The New Kids on the Blawck” and can be found at <a href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2010/04/the-new-kids-on-the-blawck.html" rel="nofollow">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2010/04/the-new-kids-on-the-blawck.html</a></p>
<p>So, yes, you are not the only person who is impressed with Seddiq.</p>
<p>The answer to your question on attorney-client privilege is probably a bit too complicated to satisfactorily address here.  Allow me to say that Mirriam has been working with me on this particular case.  Anything that was said in her presence would thus be covered under the privilege.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bagwire</title>
		<link>http://koehlerlaw.net/2010/04/on-visiting-the-supposed-crime-scene/comment-page-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Bagwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://koehlerlaw.net/?p=2252#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>I have enjoyed reading about this Miriam Seddiq whose name keeps popping up on your blog.  She sounds like a real firecracker.  Are your practices affiliated in some way?  Why, for example, was she along with you during your investigation?  And doesn&#039;t this violate the attorney-client privilege?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have enjoyed reading about this Miriam Seddiq whose name keeps popping up on your blog.  She sounds like a real firecracker.  Are your practices affiliated in some way?  Why, for example, was she along with you during your investigation?  And doesn&#8217;t this violate the attorney-client privilege?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

