﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Challenges to Field Sobriety Tests: The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test in Washington, D.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://koehlerlaw.net/2009/12/challenges-to-field-sobriety-tests-in-washington-d-c-the-horizontal-nystagmus-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://koehlerlaw.net/2009/12/challenges-to-field-sobriety-tests-in-washington-d-c-the-horizontal-nystagmus-test/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=challenges-to-field-sobriety-tests-in-washington-d-c-the-horizontal-nystagmus-test</link>
	<description>Criminal and DUI Defense in Washington, D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:38:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjones444</title>
		<link>http://koehlerlaw.net/2009/12/challenges-to-field-sobriety-tests-in-washington-d-c-the-horizontal-nystagmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-5716</link>
		<dc:creator>jjones444</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://koehlerlaw.net/?p=883#comment-5716</guid>
		<description>I think DUI attorneys and cops alike have a hard time determining the results of field sobriety tests. If the person is plastered, the results are obvious. But what about if they&#039;ve just had a couple drinks and the results are inconclusive? What do you do then? Nobody can count backwards from 100, so I&quot;m sure all of us would look drunk trying to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think DUI attorneys and cops alike have a hard time determining the results of field sobriety tests. If the person is plastered, the results are obvious. But what about if they&#8217;ve just had a couple drinks and the results are inconclusive? What do you do then? Nobody can count backwards from 100, so I&#8221;m sure all of us would look drunk trying to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Massachusetts OUI Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://koehlerlaw.net/2009/12/challenges-to-field-sobriety-tests-in-washington-d-c-the-horizontal-nystagmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Massachusetts OUI Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://koehlerlaw.net/?p=883#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Conventional field sobriety tests are designed to determine whether a driver is under the influence of alcohol by measuring the driver’s balance, coordination, and ability to follow instructions. These tests are based on the theory that someone who is intoxicated will not demonstrate the balance, coordination, and ability to follow directions which is required to pass the tests. This theory is seriously flawed, because there are a litany of other potential causes for “failing” these roadside gymnastics.
 
In addition to the conventional field sobriety tests, many police officers use the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. This test measures various aspects of involuntary eye movements, by having the DUI suspect follow a stimulus (usually a pen) with his eyes, without moving his head. While it is common knowledge that alcohol consumption can diminish balance, coordination, and the ability to follow directions, the medical phenomenon of nystagmus is outside of the common knowledge of a layperson. Therefore, expert testimony should be required as a condition to the admissibility of HGN related evidence. Massachusetts courts have long required this. See Commonwealth v. Sands, 424 Mass. 184 (1997).   

Brian E. Simoneau
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.massduidefender.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mass. OUI Attorney&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conventional field sobriety tests are designed to determine whether a driver is under the influence of alcohol by measuring the driver’s balance, coordination, and ability to follow instructions. These tests are based on the theory that someone who is intoxicated will not demonstrate the balance, coordination, and ability to follow directions which is required to pass the tests. This theory is seriously flawed, because there are a litany of other potential causes for “failing” these roadside gymnastics.</p>
<p>In addition to the conventional field sobriety tests, many police officers use the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. This test measures various aspects of involuntary eye movements, by having the DUI suspect follow a stimulus (usually a pen) with his eyes, without moving his head. While it is common knowledge that alcohol consumption can diminish balance, coordination, and the ability to follow directions, the medical phenomenon of nystagmus is outside of the common knowledge of a layperson. Therefore, expert testimony should be required as a condition to the admissibility of HGN related evidence. Massachusetts courts have long required this. See Commonwealth v. Sands, 424 Mass. 184 (1997).   </p>
<p>Brian E. Simoneau<br />
<a href="http://www.massduidefender.com" rel="nofollow">Mass. OUI Attorney</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

